Google Audit

Fine Print v1.0.0 accuracy report, scanned April 3, 2026

This is a test of Fine Print's accuracy, not a legal assessment of Google's terms. Results show what the extension flagged, including any errors.

Summary

2 clauses flagged across 2 categories

1 Medium 1 Low

No false positives or false negatives detected in this scan.

Findings

Medium

Liability is broadly disclaimed

The disclaimers section limits all commitments to just the warranty section and service-specific terms. The business user section explicitly excludes loss of profits, indirect/consequential loss, and punitive damages.

Source: "Disclaimers" section + "For business users and organizations only" subsection under Liabilities.

Low

Disputes governed by a specific jurisdiction's laws

California law governs all disputes, resolved exclusively in Santa Clara County courts.

Source: "Settling disputes, governing law, and courts" section.

What Fine Print correctly did not flag

  • Perpetual license: The content license is worldwide/royalty-free/sublicensable, but explicitly "non-exclusive" and terminates when you remove content.
  • Unilateral changes: Google says they "may update these terms" but explicitly commits to "reasonable advance notice and the opportunity to review."
  • Account termination: Suspension/termination is conditional on breaches, legal requirements, or harmful conduct.
  • Data selling/tracking/cookies: Not present in the ToS itself (lives in their separate Privacy Policy).
← Back to all audits

Fine Print is free, private, and runs entirely in your browser.

Get Fine Print